The incredible impact of giving away what you have been given …
Crowds moved constantly through the temple gates in Jerusalem. Worshipers entered carrying sacrifices, conversations, private burdens, and public appearances of devotion. Among them sat a man who never entered with them. The Bible book of Acts says he had been lame from birth, and every day somebody carried him to the temple gate called Beautiful so he could beg from the people going inside. For years, his life had unfolded within the same narrow boundaries. He watched healthy people walk past him while he remained in the same place, dependent on the attention and mercy of strangers.
Most people probably saw him without really seeing him. Familiar suffering often disappears into the background. A man sitting at the gate eventually becomes part of the scenery of religious life. Yet when the apostles Peter and John approached him on their way to prayer, Peter did not move past him with a distracted glance or a hurried apology. He stopped. Then he said something that at first sounded disappointing.
Acts 3:6 says, “But Peter said, ‘I don’t have any silver or gold for you. But I’ll give you what I have. In the name of Jesus Christ the Nazarene, get up and walk!'”
There is something unusually honest in Peter’s words. He does not pretend to possess resources he does not have. He does not speak in inflated spiritual language to avoid admitting material lack. “I don’t have any silver or gold for you” is direct and unembellished. In another setting, those words could have marked the end of the interaction. The man asked for money, and Peter did not have any to give. But the sentence does not end there.
“But I’ll give you what I have.”
That statement carries more weight than it first appears to. Peter speaks as somebody conscious that his life now contains something worth giving away. He is no longer measuring usefulness by financial capacity alone. The absence of silver and gold does not mean he has nothing to offer. What he possesses cannot be carried in a money pouch or counted in coins, but it is real enough to be given to another person in need.
The next words explain exactly what Peter means. “In the name of Jesus Christ the Nazarene, get up and walk!” Peter is not presenting his own strength as the answer to the man’s condition. The authority behind the command belongs to Jesus Christ. This is essential to the passage. Peter is not elevating himself into the role of healer. He is acting openly and confidently in the name of the risen Christ.
Christians today often read passages like this at a distance, as if they belong entirely to another category of spiritual life disconnected from ordinary obedience. Yet the striking thing about Peter in this moment is not theatrical intensity or personal greatness. It is his readiness to act from what Christ had actually given him. He did not stand there lamenting what he lacked. He did not reduce the encounter to sympathy alone. He gave what he had.
That principle reaches far beyond the miracle itself. Many believers quietly assume that usefulness in the kingdom of God belongs mainly to people with exceptional gifting, public influence, financial abundance, or unusual visibility. Acts 3 cuts against that instinct. Peter does not begin with abundance. He begins with limitation. “I don’t have any silver or gold for you.” The passage does not deny the reality of lacking resources. It simply refuses to treat that lack as the final word about what God may do through a person.
The man at the gate expected a small contribution that might help him survive another day. Instead, he encountered the authority of Jesus Christ expressed through somebody willing to give what he had received from the Lord. Peter’s words reveal a man who understood that faith in Christ was not private possession meant to remain inactive. What Christ had entrusted to him was meant to move outward toward human need.
There is also something deeply important in the fact that Peter named Jesus plainly. “In the name of Jesus Christ the Nazarene” was not decorative religious language added for effect. Peter was identifying the source of authority behind the command he spoke. The miracle was not intended to draw attention to Peter and John as remarkable men. Later in the chapter, Peter makes this explicit when he addresses the crowd gathering around them. Acts 3:12 says, “Peter saw his opportunity and addressed the crowd. ‘People of Israel,’ he said, ‘what is so surprising about this? And why stare at us as though we had made this man walk by our own power or godliness?'”
Peter understood the danger of spiritual misdirection. Human beings instinctively attach power to personalities, methods, charisma, or reputation. Peter rejected that interpretation immediately. The healing of the lame man was not evidence of Peter’s greatness, it was evidence of Christ’s authority and power.
That keeps the passage grounded where it belongs. “But I’ll give you what I have” is not a slogan about self-confidence or human potential. Peter is not encouraging people to look inward and discover hidden greatness inside themselves. The entire moment depends on what he has received through Jesus Christ. The giving flows from that relationship and authority.
The lame man entered that day expecting survival. He left walking, leaping, and praising God. Not because Peter possessed wealth, prestige, or personal power, but because one follower of Christ refused to believe that lacking silver and gold meant he had nothing worth giving.
Scotty

Leave a Reply